Author Topic: Direct contact VS. lm board  (Read 844 times)

Offline Mxr708

  • Fart Sniffer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Post quality +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Direct contact VS. lm board
« on: March 08, 2009, 03:58:00 PM »
What is the difference in the finished product?  What are the pros and cons to each.
<iframe src="http://gamercard.xbox.com/VolcomSkater708scrolling="no" frameBorder="0" height="140" width="204">VolcomSkater708</iframe>

Offline bustinthejustin

  • Registered BST
  • E = MC² Mad Scientist
  • *
  • Posts: 2326
  • Post quality +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Direct contact VS. lm board
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2009, 04:08:33 PM »
direct contact are more reactive but u can't use wifi or hold switch. you must add external. lm386, are less reactive but u can use wifi or hold switch.

Sig by Kenshinffx - Thanks!

Offline EliteGamer83

  • Millennium Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1233
  • Post quality +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Trusted Seller! Slim Modder! Graphics Artist!
Re: Direct contact VS. lm board
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2009, 04:12:39 PM »
Yeah like justin said, the direct are more reactive but you can't use wifi or hold. So it's pretty much just personal preference, I personally prefer LED activeness over over using hold or wifi, I found a nice switch that you can use for a good price.

Go to http://farnell.com/ Switches and Relays > Switches > Slide.

Jumbo- Hyperlink your URL's Thanks :D

« Last Edit: March 08, 2009, 04:16:36 PM by Jumbo »

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal