Author Topic: MW3 (Read 17281 times)

Modded Matt · « **on:** November 09, 2011, 03:19:46 PM »

here it is, the long awaited installment to the call of duty series. I for one am not impressed. it seems like i paid $60 for a new map pack. This seems to be the exact same game as mw2.. we are dubing this game MW2.5.. I see people are boosting and getting out of maps already. I am going to play the single player and coop/spec ops and leave the multiplayer to battlefield3.

Any way, its still a big deal, I am sure many disagree with me. post your thoughts, glitches and what not here!!

see ya online. "IFF Matt B"

crazy-modder · « **Reply #1 on:** November 09, 2011, 05:28:37 PM »

ive only been playing online for about 20 minutes and im not impressed at all.....this is seriously mw2.5.

toadzilla · « **Reply #2 on:** November 09, 2011, 05:41:15 PM »

i got 2 words bf3 ftw

PsychoticWolf · « **Reply #3 on:** November 09, 2011, 07:17:15 PM »

Quote from: toadzilla on November 09, 2011, 05:41:15 PM

i got 2 words bf3 ftw

Not words. Fail toad.

Phantom · « **Reply #4 on:** November 09, 2011, 07:42:37 PM »

so this is the 8th COD game? i could write COD on a bucket of

and people would buy it.

drummerdude · « **Reply #5 on:** November 09, 2011, 07:43:36 PM »

Seems like you guys dont like it, but im enjoying it. They patched the jitter mod. and i think they patched fast reload too. Rapidfire seems to be holding up tho

Tracey · « **Reply #6 on:** November 09, 2011, 08:04:55 PM »

Quote from: phantomz0 on November 09, 2011, 07:42:37 PM

so this is the 8th COD game? i could write COD on a bucket of and people would buy it.

Same goes for Apple.. still waiting on the iWash and iDry lol

Crumbz · « **Reply #7 on:** November 09, 2011, 09:15:21 PM »

Quote from: Tracey on November 09, 2011, 08:04:55 PM

Same goes for Apple.. still waiting on the iWash and iDry lol

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Quote from: toadzilla on November 09, 2011, 05:41:15 PM

i got 2 words bf3 ftw

Yup a definite fail....

But yes BF3 FTW!!!!

GhoSt · « **Reply #8 on:** November 10, 2011, 12:19:28 AM »

If you liked MW2 you will like this one.

PsychoticWolf · « **Reply #9 on:** November 10, 2011, 12:27:44 AM »

Quote from: GhoSt_Death on November 10, 2011, 12:19:28 AM

If you liked MW2 you will like this one.

Lol epic win. I actually like it. I'm gonna be playing it tonight hit me up xboxGT "psykotikwolf"

Tracey · « **Reply #10 on:** November 10, 2011, 07:43:32 AM »

I disagree..the same "annoying stuff" from MW2 is still in MW2.5 (camping, crap respawns that lead to repeated spawn killing, people that use noobs cause they cant shoot for sh*t, climbing into rocks/glitching). I can see why you guys would like MW2.5 if you liked MW2 yes, but please please please...somebody...anybody...infinityward...treyarch...bring back a quality, no BS game full of greatness like COD4 back!! Hell release a map pack for cod4, and I'll pay $60 for it!

PS: I still think care packages are the biggest piece of crap ever...if I get a killstreak reward, give me the damn thing. I shouldnt have to fight for it so some idiot with 2 kills can get lucky and spawn behind me and get a freakin chopper.

hyper999 · « **Reply #11 on:** November 10, 2011, 09:08:42 AM »

I agree it is pretty much identical, the only thing I like about this game is survival mode which is awesome

frenulem - No.5417 · « **Reply #12 on:** November 10, 2011, 11:46:22 AM »

Tracey, CoD 4 wasn't a perfect game, remember frag x3 and such? no a CoD life cycle is like this AWESOME -1/2 months- WTF CRAPPY GLITCHY GAME -1/2 months before release of next CoD- Really liking the game again - 2/3 years later- Best CoD in series, where as battlefield is like Good solid well built game. and thats the end of it, Not saying any is better but i just dont want to throw £40 at a thing thats gonna last me 2 months

and this lazy ass design http://youtu.be/b5dsOn06w1s and the 'nade indicators are the same i mean if the copied the textures what else did they copy? where they just sitting around the office for 3 months then think damn we got a game to dev?

edit: that link and second paragraph mini rant, also i put 2 weeks not 2 months

Tracey · « **Reply #13 on:** November 10, 2011, 03:16:07 PM »

Quote from: frenulem - No.5417 on November 10, 2011, 11:46:22 AM

Tracey, CoD 4 wasn't a perfect game

no..but it was damn close! lol

Modded Matt · « **Reply #14 on:** November 10, 2011, 03:49:33 PM »

http://youtu.be/b5dsOn06w1s

wow

PsychoticWolf · « **Reply #15 on:** November 10, 2011, 04:09:59 PM »

Quote from: Tracey on November 10, 2011, 03:16:07 PM

no..but it was damn close! lol

So right! mw3 is alright but I quickly learned that is was just mw2 with a new name and better graphics.

FOOKz™ · « **Reply #16 on:** November 11, 2011, 09:02:11 PM »

MW2.5 ... LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Halo ... FTW

BF3 ... meh, haven't tried it yet.

PsychoticWolf · « **Reply #17 on:** November 11, 2011, 09:20:56 PM »

Quote from: modded matt on November 10, 2011, 03:49:33 PM

http://youtu.be/b5dsOn06w1s

wow

But honestly is that really a problem? I know tons of Devs personally, who will reuse Models from previous games and change the textures.

Nevbox · « **Reply #18 on:** November 12, 2011, 06:26:23 AM »

Quote from: PsychoticWolf on November 11, 2011, 09:20:56 PM

But honestly is that really a problem? I know tons of Devs personally, who will reuse Models from previous games and change the textures.

I have to agree, bit sad of me,but I have noticed sound effects and other material being used in BFBC2, MOH and BF3! It happens alot and honestly not surprising.

EDIT: BF3 all the waaaay.

FOOKz™ · « **Reply #19 on:** November 12, 2011, 06:47:57 AM »

I would understand reusing models such as weapons and characters... but a building? really!? wooow its not hard to do in 3D cad... first you draw a rectangle, extrude it, hollow it out, add a few extra features to it like windows and a roof and then finally add textures to it -- takes about a week if you're skilled... they had all year to make this game...

herp a derp ohai gise i made a copypasta vidya gaem look how 1337 i is.

geraldrubalcava · « **Reply #20 on:** November 12, 2011, 07:49:54 AM »

they may be reusing the texture, but again, it makes it look like a mw type of game.
plus cod4 is using a different engine that mw2 and mw3 sooo, i thinks that they did not reuse buildings. And its not as easy as using CAD.. remember, these guys make the engine from scratch, so all the tools they can use are the ones they can make themselves. but besides texturing there is also lighting , how texture reacts to lighting, etc.....

Nevbox if you do know alot of devs, ask them about the development cycle that they go though, and ask them how long it takes. you will be surprised how much something can take sometimes to develop.

Edit: and if you wanna complain about how a game looks then go to black ops... they been using the COD4 engine for there games.. I.E. COD5,7

frenulem - No.5417 · « **Reply #21 on:** November 12, 2011, 08:54:12 AM »

nope, MW3 is running on an updated MW2 engine, IW just seem lazy, and TBH you can't judge any game of CoD during the honeymoon period

Nevbox · « **Reply #22 on:** November 12, 2011, 11:49:40 AM »

I understand it takes time,but honestly BF2 came out in 2005.

geraldrubalcava · « **Reply #23 on:** November 12, 2011, 12:01:11 PM »

lol true. yes Mw2 engine is called IW6 engine... treyarch is still using IW4 and probably will for the future. lol... hum no not lazy. does anyone remember that IW is 1/5 of the staff it was back on MW2 production days? its because of the majority of the company leaving to EA. but ehh its still a upgrade from Blackops lol

and more reason since BF2 to BF3 they had 5 years to made the best game they don't even make there own engine.... and when i play it its not as fast playing...

we can all agree that both are good games.

frenulem - No.5417 · « **Reply #24 on:** November 12, 2011, 12:52:39 PM »

well from BF2 they did make BF:BC and BF:BC2, and yeah it's not as fast paced in rush or conquest, but play TDM it's a madhouse, also not making your own engine isn't a bad thing, i'd say it's worse, you have one year to make a game, and you spend a chunk of that time building an engine, and not the game, thats why people can get into rocks and outta the map in MW£ and i have seen no bugs in BF3 so far (played 15 hours) but yeah both are good games, just saying why i prefer one over the other.

GhoSt · « **Reply #25 on:** November 12, 2011, 08:04:04 PM »

People who say spawning is bad in cod obliviously haven't played enough BF3 yet, flip to 1:02 in this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc7Sv4gYWFk&feature=channel_video_title

geraldrubalcava · « **Reply #26 on:** November 12, 2011, 09:11:25 PM »

wow that was some funny epic spawn trap killing lol. both are good, but personally i like MW3 because seems faster too me... but BF3 is still a good game.

frenulem - No.5417 · « **Reply #27 on:** November 12, 2011, 09:16:48 PM »

the reason that was spawn trapping was because people were being idiots and spawning on team mates, you cant actually get into the enemy's spawn in BF3

Tracey · « **Reply #28 on:** November 13, 2011, 06:10:21 PM »

Even though it's totally a copy of Zombie mode...I'm addicted to MW2.5's survival mode. Been playing that crap for hours.

PsychoticWolf · « **Reply #29 on:** November 13, 2011, 07:31:13 PM »

Quote from: Tracey on November 13, 2011, 06:10:21 PM

Even though it's totally a copy of Zombie mode...I'm addicted to MW2.5's survival mode. Been playing that crap for hours.

Ha ha ha Yeah the survival mode is pretty fun.

News:

Author Topic: MW3 (Read 17281 times)